I've just taken close to 600 photos of the Tristan Stone. I think I have enough!
I've just taken close to 600 photos of the Tristan Stone. I think I have enough!
Over the last few years the way I take and manage photos has changed. I used to take photos on a compact digital camera, and every time I came back from an event or holiday I would transfer them to iPhoto on my Mac. Those photos I liked best I would upload to my Flickr account. It was pretty simple.
Now, things are more complex. I have a digital SLR which I use to shoot in RAW, and an iPhone. I have a MacBook Pro and an iMac. Many of the photos I take on my iPhone are uploaded to services such as Instagram automatically. Auto upload is enabled on the iOS Google+ app. My photos are becoming fragmented, and I’m not sharing as many photos as I used to. Lightroom is on my MacBook and iPhoto is on my iMac.
Because the RAW photos must be developed (I use Lightroom) I upload less frequently. When I do edit in Lightroom, the photos tend to stay as RAW. It takes ages to export, and I always like to think that I’ll keep the RAW images in case I want to redevelop them at a later stage (I’ve encountered heavily edited JPEGs in the past I wish I hadn’t been so heavy with).
So I have RAW photos on my MacBook Pro. A neglected iPhoto library lives on my iMac. I experimented with Picasa 3.9 to extract myself from iPhoto because the metadata isn’t stored in the EXIF or IPTC headers of JPEGs by using an export routine.
My photos are everywhere, and I’ve let things get into a mess.
I have had a look at online photo backup services such as Snapjoy and Everpix, both of whom state that you can have all of your photos all in one place by aggregating from other sources (Instagram, etc). This they do, but you can’t add any extra metadata – titles, descriptions and tags. These humble fields represent memories and context. What is a photo if you can’t add notes to it? I’m lucky enough to have some family photos from the 19th century, and some of them have been written on the reverse in pencil. I know who is in many of them, where they were taken.
I have had a look at OpenPhoto, so that I could create my own personal version of Flickr. Tricky to set up, it too doesn’t store any metadata in the images themselves. Also, some folk suggest that it’s not a system for tens of thousands of photos (I have 25K+).
If I use an online system for organising and sharing my photos, I would like to be able move them to another system, user-added metadata intact. All my titles, descriptions, tags, and location data. Permanently. That metadata represents my memories. It’s the writing on the back of a photo.
What I keep coming back to is Flickr. Good old Flickr. I compare all photo sharing sites back to it, and none of them live up to it in terms of functionality and community. What I really need to do is get some auto uploading software that intelligently updates my iOS camera roll to Flickr, with privacy set to ‘private’. Periodically, on whichever computer I choose, I could use Flickr’s excellent ‘Organizr’ tool to put photos into Sets and Collections. There are tools which will download your photo stream and embed metadata into the images themselves. There must be a setup where I can use Flickr as the hub for everything? Could it work? This I intend to try out. 2013 will be a return to Flickr for me.
So, how will it work?
I have discovered an iOS app called CameraSync which can synchronise my camera roll to Flickr (as well as S3, FTP, Dropbox, etc). This can be configured to run automatically when I get home and the app recognises the SSID of my WiFi router. Or I can override it and upload via 3G (upload speeds on the 3 network here in this part of the UK can be 1.6Mb/s which is pretty decent).
Using the Flickr tool from Lightroom, I will upload all developed images into sets.
I have discovered SocialFolders, a service and client which downloads content from social media sites onto a local drive. It’s a kind of distributed Dropbox, if you like. They will also upload – folders become sets on Flickr. Thus I can keep a local copy of all my photos as JPEGs and should anything happen to Flickr, I still have my photos.
What the SocialFolders client does not yet do is embed metadata, but I am in discussions with Philippe Honigman who runs the service. He says that this feature may come in 2013. If this does happen, it’s a huge deal for photographers who take their metadata seriously. We own our photos, and we also own our metadata.
Let’s see if this works.
Regular visitors to my blog will know that I regularly post photos whilst I am out and about via the excellent Instagram app. I also take more refined photos with a digital SLR, which I post to PhotoShelter, which are available to license for commercial or personal use.
Here is a small gallery of photos taken in and around my home town, Penzance in Cornwall, UK.
[photoshelter-gallery g_id=’G0000PqmPNhEArIk’ g_name=’Penzance’ width=’600′ f_fullscreen=’t’ bgtrans=’t’ pho_credit=’iptc’ twoup=’f’ f_bbar=’t’ f_bbarbig=’f’ fsvis=’f’ f_show_caption=’t’ crop=’f’ f_enable_embed_btn=’t’ f_htmllinks=’t’ f_l=’t’ f_send_to_friend_btn=’f’ f_show_slidenum=’t’ f_topbar=’f’ f_show_watermark=’t’ img_title=’casc’ linkdest=’c’ trans=’xfade’ target=’_self’ tbs=’5000′ f_link=’t’ f_smooth=’f’ f_mtrx=’t’ f_ap=’t’ f_up=’f’ height=’400′ btype=’old’ bcolor=’#CCCCCC’ ]
I often see silhouetted figures out on the edge of the tide digging for bait, toiling away filling buckets of ragworms and lugworms. I’m glad that I was able to capture this image, my first with a telephoto lens (Canon FD 70-210mm) – I like the bands of colour and the tiny contrast of the yellow bucket in the centre of the frame.
This photos was an experiment with a long exposure to get that glassy look to the sea paid off. Taken as RAW at ISO100, this was a 30 second exposure at f/18.0 on a Canon 550d, developed in Lightroom.
I have recently bought a Canon 550d, my first DSLR camera. Fascinated as I am by old lenses, I bought a high quality FD/EOS adapter so that I can use the Canon FD range of lenses that were used from the early 1970s until 1990.
A local camera shop has a large range of secondhand FD lenses in stock, and by the looks of it they rarely sell any, so I was able to pick up an FD 50mm F1:1.4 for a good price (part exchanged my old Panasonic Lumix FZ30).
This is one of the first photos I took with this lens, a bowl of apples under fading daylight. I am rather pleased with it – the resulting image is soft and appley – just how I’d hoped.
I’ve now had my E71 for a couple of weeks or so, and I’m still loving it.
The camera is renowned (from reviews that I’ve read anyway) for being between utterly average and really poor. These definitions are, of course, subjective. After a few weeks of use, I would prefer to call the camera “idiosyncratic”. It behaves with quite a mind of its own.
So rather than going through the camera’s interface (that can be found elsewhere), I’ll talk more generally about it.
Let’s begin by letting this Flickr gallery do some of the speaking for me. Adjustments made to these photos range between none at all, to drastic. Most of them were done ‘rough and ready’ in iPhoto.
The phone that the E71 replaced was the 3 Skypephone, whose camera really is utterly, utterly awful (in the 1st generation phone at least). Bear that in mind when I say that I actually think that the E71’s camera is reasonable. I probably say this because I’m used to editing photos, and I don’t mind a bit of camera noise. I like to take arty (in the loosest possible terms) and unusual shots, and for the odd snap with friends, it fulfills those needs entirely.
I sometimes find that it takes an abnormally long time to take a photo, and often when this happens, it is very overexposed. However, in some of the occasions when this has happened, I’ve loved the results! In a way, since the camera is a bit of a novelty really, I love this unpredictability.
In low light conditions, there’s lots of noise, which according to some renders it unusable. I prefer to ignore that and use it to my advantage. I’ll make grainy and gritty photos instead:
I’m finding that the limitations of the camera is making me think more about composition, that’s for sure!
In the next post I’ll focus on some of the software that I have thus far installed.
At long last, Flickr users can finally have “sets of sets”! Requests for this feature have been repeatedly been made for at least 2 years, but at last our patience has been rewarded. Flickr call this feature “Collections”. Head over to the Flickr Blog to read the full news.